AccessOwl
Automate your access approval process right in Slack
Zeda.io
AI-powered Product Discovery For Customer-focused Teams
Updated February 2026
| AccessOwl | Zeda.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 5 | 23 |
| Pros | 12 | 16 |
| FactScore™ | 38.9 | 69 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in AccessOwl — Pros
Access chaos reduction Access request handling Compliance support ISO/SOC2 compliance User account discovery Easy access reviews GSuite permissions management Provisioning via Slack Security improvement Startup friendly Third-party app access notificationsBoth tools — Pros
Slack integrationOnly in Zeda.io — Pros
Release notes creation User-friendly interface Product management features AI-powered insights All-in-one tool Customer-centric approach Operational efficiency Data-driven decisions Analytics Collaboration features Academy section Affordable Ease of migration Insightful content Integrations with major toolsOnly in AccessOwl — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Zeda.io — Cons
Room for improvementDetails
| AccessOwl | Zeda.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Team collaboration software, Automation tools, Slack apps | Project management software, Team collaboration software, Product add-ons |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | November 25, 2021 | July 31, 2021 |
| Website | www.accessowl.io | zeda.io |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose AccessOwl if...
- Access chaos reduction
- Access request handling
- Compliance support
Choose Zeda.io if...
- Release notes creation
- User-friendly interface
- Product management features
With a FactScore™ of 38.9 vs 69, Zeda.io leads in community reception. AccessOwl uniquely offers Access chaos reduction and Access request handling, while Zeda.io stands out for Release notes creation and User-friendly interface.
What Users Say
AccessOwl
AccessOwl is a must-have for startups that have to do proper access reviews for ISO/SOC2 but don't have the budget for Enterprise budget solutions like Okta yet! Give it a try and see what kind of ...
Fantastic product that the people at AccessOwl are building! We are customers, and it‘s making our compliance access reviews super easy and straightforward. Thanks to that, we were able to reduce t...
It is very handy to fetch all the existing permissions from GSuite and handle them on slack. Otherwise I need to check it every now and then whenever I have a breach paranoia 🙃 Does it notify me o...
Zeda.io
Congrats on the launch! Love the slack plugin. Just a suggestion (dunno if possible): have you thought of accessing feedback via Jira tickets? This looks like something that could replace Jira so m...
Zeda.io is a brilliant AI-powered platform that is transforming the landscape of product discovery and strategy. It facilitates product teams in identifying customer problems, deciding on future bu...
I like the UI of the website. What I appreciate is an Academy section so one can be more aware of how to use the product! Good job, team!
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, AccessOwl or Zeda.io?
Based on FactScore™, Zeda.io leads with a score of 69 vs 38.9. Zeda.io has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of AccessOwl compared to Zeda.io?
AccessOwl uniquely offers: Access chaos reduction, Access request handling, Compliance support, ISO/SOC2 compliance, User account discovery.
What are the pros of Zeda.io compared to AccessOwl?
Zeda.io uniquely offers: Release notes creation, User-friendly interface, Product management features, AI-powered insights, All-in-one tool.
Is AccessOwl better rated than Zeda.io?
AccessOwl is rated 5.0★ from 5 reviews. Zeda.io is rated 5.0★ from 23 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of AccessOwl and Zeda.io?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. AccessOwl scores 38.9 and Zeda.io scores 69.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free