AI Detector by CaS
Detect with Confidence : Your Ultimate AI Detector (FREE)
Langfuse
Open Source LLM Engineering Platform
Updated February 2026
| AI Detector by CaS | Langfuse | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.1★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 7 | 41 |
| Pros | 6 | 18 |
| FactScore™ | 28.4 | 81.2 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in AI Detector by CaS — Pros
Detailed analysis Visual cues Accuracy AI detection Line by line feedbackBoth tools — Pros
Free tierOnly in Langfuse — Pros
LLM observability Open source Detailed tracing Monitoring capabilities Cost-effective Easy to integrate SDK availability Seamless integration Debugging tools Fast iterations Insightful analytics Community engagement Detailed analytics Excellent UI Flexible architecture Open API Robust telemetryOnly in AI Detector by CaS — Cons
Version inconsistency Incorrect detection results Subscription cancellation issuesBoth tools — Cons
—Only in Langfuse — Cons
—Details
| AI Detector by CaS | Langfuse | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | AI Metrics and Evaluation, AI Content Detection | AI Infrastructure Tools, AI Metrics and Evaluation |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | March 10, 2023 | August 20, 2023 |
| Website | contentatscale.ai | langfuse.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose AI Detector by CaS if...
- Detailed analysis
- Visual cues
- Accuracy
Choose Langfuse if...
- LLM observability
- Open source
- Detailed tracing
With a FactScore™ of 28.4 vs 81.2, Langfuse leads in community reception. AI Detector by CaS uniquely offers Detailed analysis and Visual cues, while Langfuse stands out for LLM observability and Open source.
What Users Say
AI Detector by CaS
Great concept. However, when I tried it, it didn't recognize that the text entered was generated with chatgpt...
Nice
I've been dabbling with C@S, and its competitors - and having a free, comprehensive AI detector that not only alerts you to whether content appears written in AI (or just by a very bad writer) is a...
Langfuse
Without Langfuse, we would have been flying blind with our drafting agent. This platform is critical not just for measuring performance, but for understanding exactly what context gets pulled into ...
So excited to see Langfuse go live — we've been a happy user for 4 weeks now. Most detailed latency and analytics in the market. Highly recommend for anyone using complex chains or with user-f...
We’ve been unsung Langfuse for 2 months now. It’s easy to integrate and makes it simpler for us to monitor & debug LLM requests during development and beyond.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, AI Detector by CaS or Langfuse?
Based on FactScore™, Langfuse leads with a score of 81.2 vs 28.4. Langfuse has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 3.1★.
What are the pros of AI Detector by CaS compared to Langfuse?
AI Detector by CaS uniquely offers: Detailed analysis, Visual cues, Accuracy, AI detection, Line by line feedback.
What are the pros of Langfuse compared to AI Detector by CaS?
Langfuse uniquely offers: LLM observability, Open source, Detailed tracing, Monitoring capabilities, Cost-effective.
Is AI Detector by CaS better rated than Langfuse?
AI Detector by CaS is rated 3.1★ from 7 reviews. Langfuse is rated 5.0★ from 41 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of AI Detector by CaS and Langfuse?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. AI Detector by CaS scores 28.4 and Langfuse scores 81.2.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free