Astro
The web framework that scales with you.
Backendless
Build scalable apps at lightning speed
Updated February 2026
| Astro | Backendless | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 44 | 5 |
| Pros | 19 | 16 |
| FactScore™ | 82.7 | 38.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Astro — Pros
Fast performance Excellent developer experience Static site generation Easy setup Easy to learn Content-driven websites Flexible deployment Island architecture Lightweight build Markdown support Starlight theme Templates availability Zero JS by default Full-stack development Modular architecture Partial hydration Supports multiple frameworks View transitions Vite coreBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Backendless — Pros
Fast development Founder involvement Customization Easy to get started Excellent documentation Low-code platform Nocode app builder Robust backend Unlimited scalability Gamified learning GDPR support Open source OpenAI API integration Responsive UI Strong support community Versatile business rulesOnly in Astro — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Backendless — Cons
—Details
| Astro | Backendless | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Website builders, Static site generators | Website builders, No-code Platforms, Automation tools |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | November 8, 2022 | January 30, 2016 |
| Website | astro.build | backendless.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Astro if...
- Fast performance
- Excellent developer experience
- Static site generation
Choose Backendless if...
- Fast development
- Founder involvement
- Customization
With a FactScore™ of 82.7 vs 38.9, Astro leads in community reception. Astro uniquely offers Fast performance and Excellent developer experience, while Backendless stands out for Fast development and Founder involvement.
What Users Say
Astro
I've used many content-driven web frameworks, but Astro is the one that hits the sweet spot for me. Not only is it very easy to use, but it also includes everything I need to create a blog or a lan...
I wanted a way to make Blankie a great website without a lot of upkeep, and Astro delivered. The Vite core underneath it all generates such a clean static site and I'm thrilled that the site is 100...
Our UI framework for a fast, minimal JS experience. Astro’s island architecture lets us ship a responsive dashboard with React where it counts, and static where it’s best perfect for an ops heavy t...
Backendless
I see it as the best nocode app builder out there(tried Airtable + Softr, Notion obviously, Coda, Jetadmin, Plasmic, Tooljet, Noodl - you literally name it and boom - I tried it). It's valid, intui...
I have been trying out lowcode/nocode solutions for quite some time now, and being based in Europe, Backendless stood out for their support for GDPR legislation, but also their outstanding support ...
Backendless is an intelligently designed low-code platform for any web application that requires a strong database back-end, versatile implementation of business rules, and a pleasant, responsive U...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Astro or Backendless?
Based on FactScore™, Astro leads with a score of 82.7 vs 38.9. Astro has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Astro compared to Backendless?
Astro uniquely offers: Fast performance, Excellent developer experience, Static site generation, Easy setup, Easy to learn.
What are the pros of Backendless compared to Astro?
Backendless uniquely offers: Fast development, Founder involvement, Customization, Easy to get started, Excellent documentation.
Is Astro better rated than Backendless?
Astro is rated 5.0★ from 44 reviews. Backendless is rated 5.0★ from 5 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Astro and Backendless?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Astro scores 82.7 and Backendless scores 38.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free