Astro
The web framework that scales with you.
Bookshelf.so
Your shareable books page with a 3D interactive bookshelf
Updated February 2026
| Astro | Bookshelf.so | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 3.7★ |
| Reviews | 44 | 3 |
| Pros | 19 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 82.7 | 22.1 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Astro — Pros
Fast performance Excellent developer experience Static site generation Easy setup Easy to learn Content-driven websites Flexible deployment Island architecture Lightweight build Markdown support Starlight theme Templates availability Zero JS by default Full-stack development Modular architecture Partial hydration Supports multiple frameworks View transitions Vite coreBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Bookshelf.so — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in Astro — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Bookshelf.so — Cons
—Details
| Astro | Bookshelf.so | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Website builders, Static site generators | Website builders, Social bookmarking, Link in bio tools |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | November 8, 2022 | March 27, 2024 |
| Website | astro.build | bookshelf.so |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Astro if...
- Fast performance
- Excellent developer experience
- Static site generation
Choose Bookshelf.so if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 82.7 vs 22.1, Astro leads in community reception. Astro uniquely offers Fast performance and Excellent developer experience, while Bookshelf.so stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
Astro
I've used many content-driven web frameworks, but Astro is the one that hits the sweet spot for me. Not only is it very easy to use, but it also includes everything I need to create a blog or a lan...
I wanted a way to make Blankie a great website without a lot of upkeep, and Astro delivered. The Vite core underneath it all generates such a clean static site and I'm thrilled that the site is 100...
Our UI framework for a fast, minimal JS experience. Astro’s island architecture lets us ship a responsive dashboard with React where it counts, and static where it’s best perfect for an ops heavy t...
Bookshelf.so
Pretty cool, but wish the interface displayed more books covers and allowed for the creation of multiple shelves. I did the import from Goodreads and it worked pretty well, but I was expecting it t...
Fun take on sharing your books. It's still early in its development, hence the 4 stars rather than five. but with a few small bug fixes, a little more documentation, a UX tweak or two, and perhaps ...
I like it. Clean. Simple. Has the potential to become a better version of GoodReads as they add other features and mature the offering. Good start. (I like the hack of being able to bring in your G...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Astro or Bookshelf.so?
Based on FactScore™, Astro leads with a score of 82.7 vs 22.1. Astro has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 3.7★.
What are the pros of Astro compared to Bookshelf.so?
Astro uniquely offers: Fast performance, Excellent developer experience, Static site generation, Easy setup, Easy to learn.
What are the pros of Bookshelf.so compared to Astro?
Bookshelf.so uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is Astro better rated than Bookshelf.so?
Astro is rated 5.0★ from 44 reviews. Bookshelf.so is rated 3.7★ from 3 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Astro and Bookshelf.so?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Astro scores 82.7 and Bookshelf.so scores 22.1.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free