Closely

Enjoy all-in-one seamless sales automation platform

★★★★★ 4.6/5
FactScore™ 65.7
VS

Postmark

Email for web applications

★★★★★ 5.0/5
FactScore™ 62.8

Updated February 2026

Closely Postmark
Rating 4.6★ 5.0★
Reviews 25 17
Pros 15 9
FactScore™ 65.7 62.8

FactScore™ Comparison

FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.

👑
65.7
Closely FactScore™
★ Closely wins on FactScore™
62.8
Postmark FactScore™

Pros & Cons

Only in Closely — Pros

LinkedIn automation LinkedIn outreach User-friendly interface Continuous updates Customer support Lead generation Message templates B2B contact database Chrome extension Cloud-based Email integration LinkedIn CRM Responsive team Scalable outreach

Both tools — Pros

Affordable pricing

Only in Postmark — Pros

Reliable email delivery Fast performance Human support Transactional email Email templates Excellent documentation Simple API Spam filter

Only in Closely — Cons

Missing features Fake reviews Buggy software Inaccurate lead data Customer support Not in chrome app store Tags and hashtags Total leads captured list inaccessible Unfair cancellation policy

Both tools — Cons

Only in Postmark — Cons

Details

Closely Postmark
Categories Email marketing, Marketing automation platforms, Lead generation software Email clients, Email marketing
Platforms Web Web · iOS
Became Popular June 30, 2022 July 23, 2014
Website closelyhq.com postmarkapp.com

Who Should Pick Which?

Choose Closely if...

  • LinkedIn automation
  • LinkedIn outreach
  • User-friendly interface

Choose Postmark if...

  • Reliable email delivery
  • Fast performance
  • Human support

With a FactScore™ of 65.7 vs 62.8, Closely leads in community reception. Closely uniquely offers LinkedIn automation and LinkedIn outreach, while Postmark stands out for Reliable email delivery and Fast performance.

3

What Users Say

Closely

A
Altiam Feb 7, 2023
★★★★★

One of the great LinkedIn automation.

A
Andrew Nov 12, 2025
★★★★★

At the time I purchased it, the base model came packed with so much more that others were charging for.LinkedIn campaignsSmart throttling to warm-up my profile's outreach capacityOutlook email conn...

K
Katja Nov 12, 2025
★★★★★

I don't know any alternatives, but with Closely I can have automated message campaigns on LinkedIn with or without having to get their email addresses, that is all I know.

Postmark

D
Daniil Oct 31, 2025
★★★★★

We use Postmark to send emails and manage newsletters directly from BlogBowl. Big thanks to Postmark for their reliable API and top-notch deliverability, which makes sure your newsletters actually ...

Y
Yaniv Nov 19, 2024
★★★★★

We use Postmark not only for our emails, but also to power Ply's built-in dynamic email capabilities. It's reliable, well documented and most of all - comes with awesome human support.

D
Dr Sep 26, 2024
★★★★★

Once you get familiar with Postmark's layouts and templates, the service is great for quickly creating email templates and sending them out using their simple API. The UI is simple and intuitive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Closely or Postmark?

Based on FactScore™, Closely leads with a score of 65.7 vs 62.8. Closely has a higher rating of 4.6★ compared to 5.0★.

What are the pros of Closely compared to Postmark?

Closely uniquely offers: LinkedIn automation, LinkedIn outreach, User-friendly interface, Continuous updates, Customer support.

What are the pros of Postmark compared to Closely?

Postmark uniquely offers: Reliable email delivery, Fast performance, Human support, Transactional email, Email templates.

Is Closely better rated than Postmark?

Closely is rated 4.6★ from 25 reviews. Postmark is rated 5.0★ from 17 reviews.

What is the FactScore™ of Closely and Postmark?

FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Closely scores 65.7 and Postmark scores 62.8.

Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos

The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.

Try FactCheckTool Free