Cohesive AI
The most powerful AI editor
tiddlywiki
A non-linear personal web notebook
Updated February 2026
| Cohesive AI | tiddlywiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 7 | 15 |
| Pros | 14 | 13 |
| FactScore™ | 38.7 | 60.2 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Cohesive AI — Pros
User-friendly interface Content templates Enhanced AI writing experience Productivity boost AI voices Quick content editing Expand, summarize, and rephrase features High-quality voice output Integration with reference links Multilingual support Sales content creation Social media content generation Team collaboration features Text to speech conversionBoth tools — Pros
—Only in tiddlywiki — Pros
Flexible Reliable Community support Customizable Powerful knowledge management Portable Single html file Versatile Hyper-extensible Spaced repetition Feature-rich Future safe Open sourceOnly in Cohesive AI — Cons
Error during login Misunderstanding in content generationBoth tools — Cons
—Only in tiddlywiki — Cons
Steep learning curveDetails
| Cohesive AI | tiddlywiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Note and writing apps, AI Coding Agents, Writing assistants | Note and writing apps, Project management software, Website builders |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | April 10, 2023 | October 17, 2017 |
| Website | cohesive.so | tiddlywiki.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Cohesive AI if...
- User-friendly interface
- Content templates
- Enhanced AI writing experience
Choose tiddlywiki if...
- Flexible
- Reliable
- Community support
With a FactScore™ of 38.7 vs 60.2, tiddlywiki leads in community reception. Cohesive AI uniquely offers User-friendly interface and Content templates, while tiddlywiki stands out for Flexible and Reliable.
What Users Say
Cohesive AI
🌟 I Just tried Cohesive AI, and I'm blown away! 🤯 I've been using AI-driven tools for content generation for a while now, but Cohesive AI takes it to another level. The seamless integration of AI...
Love the extra features you offer! It adds so much more to the AI writing experience over ChatGPT. Already experimenting with the expand, summarize, and rephrase features. Congratulations on the la...
Just came across this tool last week & it's so addictive! Definitely increased my productivity as a sales professional. It's built on Chatgpt so the experience on prompts is similar but the int...
tiddlywiki
The learning curve is so steep you might want to drop it at the very beginning. But don't be deceived! Once you get a hang of how tiddlers work and set up a system that matches your workflow, the p...
Did your favorite reading software disappear overnight (rhymes with Rocket) ? Or maybe your "free" information manager decided to start charging you the equivalent of an automobile payment (rhymes ...
TiddlyWiki can be a simple journal that somehow keeps memories local to your devices and easy to find for 20 years, or a personal in-browser app framework, if you're susceptible to nerd sniping. Us...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cohesive AI or tiddlywiki?
Based on FactScore™, tiddlywiki leads with a score of 60.2 vs 38.7. tiddlywiki has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.3★.
What are the pros of Cohesive AI compared to tiddlywiki?
Cohesive AI uniquely offers: User-friendly interface, Content templates, Enhanced AI writing experience, Productivity boost, AI voices.
What are the pros of tiddlywiki compared to Cohesive AI?
tiddlywiki uniquely offers: Flexible, Reliable, Community support, Customizable, Powerful knowledge management.
Is Cohesive AI better rated than tiddlywiki?
Cohesive AI is rated 4.3★ from 7 reviews. tiddlywiki is rated 5.0★ from 15 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Cohesive AI and tiddlywiki?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Cohesive AI scores 38.7 and tiddlywiki scores 60.2.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free