Consensus
A search engine that finds you answers in scientific papers
Parsio
Automate data extraction with AI-powered document parser
Updated February 2026
| Consensus | Parsio | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 3.0★ |
| Reviews | 12 | 6 |
| Pros | 10 | 7 |
| FactScore™ | 55.7 | 25.4 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Consensus — Pros
Evidence-backed search results Trustworthy answers Scientific-based answers Superior to Google Scholar Clean UI Clickable links to studies Data-driven insights Relevant results Transparency and inclusivity User-friendly platformBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Parsio — Pros
Email parsing Data export to Sheets AI-powered OCR GPT parser support Handles scanned and handwritten documents Integration with webhooks Real-time data exportOnly in Consensus — Cons
Early stage development Lack of date filteringBoth tools — Cons
—Only in Parsio — Cons
Account deactivation Lifetime deal issues Service degradation for early adopters Forced migration to paid plans Poor customer supportDetails
| Consensus | Parsio | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Knowledge base software, Data analysis tools, Search | Data analysis tools, Automation tools, AI Infrastructure Tools |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | September 8, 2022 | December 14, 2021 |
| Website | consensus.app | parsio.io |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Consensus if...
- Evidence-backed search results
- Trustworthy answers
- Scientific-based answers
Choose Parsio if...
- Email parsing
- Data export to Sheets
- AI-powered OCR
With a FactScore™ of 55.7 vs 25.4, Consensus leads in community reception. Consensus uniquely offers Evidence-backed search results and Trustworthy answers, while Parsio stands out for Email parsing and Data export to Sheets.
What Users Say
Consensus
This works like a dream. I'll give you a concrete example... As a parent of a child with multiple special needs, we are always looking for answers we can trust. But when you ask Google for answers,...
Congrats on the launch! It's really helpful, I used to try via prompts in chat asking GPT to give answers based on research papers. But I would check the answers by asking for the title of the arti...
Congratulations on the launch, @eols76 ! It's wonderful to see makers taking a problem (ChatGPT returning source links that are dead-ends) and turning it into a useful solution for users. I'm sure ...
Parsio
👏🎉 Huge congrats to Andrew, the creator of Parsio! 🙌 I'm blown away by this amazing tool that simplifies data extraction and entry. 🤖 With Parsio, parsing templates and AI-powered parsers, extr...
When the product first launched on AppSumo, it worked flawlessly. I could easily parse any email by creating a custom template that matched the necessary fields across multiple inboxes. The setup w...
The "Lifetime" Deal That Didn't Last a Lifetime 🕐💔 TL;DR: Bought a "Lifetime Deal" for Parsio in 2022. In 2025, they decided "lifetime" means 1-3.5 years. Now pushing paid subscriptions. Proceed ...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Consensus or Parsio?
Based on FactScore™, Consensus leads with a score of 55.7 vs 25.4. Consensus has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 3.0★.
What are the pros of Consensus compared to Parsio?
Consensus uniquely offers: Evidence-backed search results, Trustworthy answers, Scientific-based answers, Superior to Google Scholar, Clean UI.
What are the pros of Parsio compared to Consensus?
Parsio uniquely offers: Email parsing, Data export to Sheets, AI-powered OCR, GPT parser support, Handles scanned and handwritten documents.
Is Consensus better rated than Parsio?
Consensus is rated 5.0★ from 12 reviews. Parsio is rated 3.0★ from 6 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Consensus and Parsio?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Consensus scores 55.7 and Parsio scores 25.4.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free