Cursor
The AI Code Editor
GPT Pilot
Develop entire app using AI while overseeing code
Updated February 2026
| Cursor | GPT Pilot | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 721 | 7 |
| Pros | 18 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 141.5 | 45.2 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Cursor — Pros
Seamless integration Intelligent code suggestions Code generation Pair programming AI autocomplete Context aware Fast performance VS Code integration Real-time debugging Error detection Git integration Privacy mode Built-in terminal Inline diagnostics Multi-cursor editing Multiple ai models Offline mode Vibe-codingBoth tools — Pros
—Only in GPT Pilot — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in Cursor — Cons
Context aware Occasional crashes Breaking changes High memory usage Overwhelming features Subscription cost VS Code integrationBoth tools — Cons
—Only in GPT Pilot — Cons
—Details
| Cursor | GPT Pilot | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Code editors, AI Coding Agents, Vibe Coding Tools, AI Code Editors | No-code Platforms, Code editors, AI Coding Agents, AI Infrastructure Tools, Prompt Engineering Tools |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | February 29, 2024 | October 5, 2023 |
| Website | cursor.com | github.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Cursor if...
- Seamless integration
- Intelligent code suggestions
- Code generation
Choose GPT Pilot if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 141.5 vs 45.2, Cursor leads in community reception. Cursor uniquely offers Seamless integration and Intelligent code suggestions, while GPT Pilot stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
Cursor
I still use Claude Code quite a bit in a Cursor built-in terminal actually. But it's hard to beat all the editor integrations Cursor includes. Claude Code has just option+cmd+k.I kicked the tires o...
Cursor is the AI coding assistant I didn’t know I needed until I used it. It integrates directly with my coding workflow, making debugging, refactoring, and even writing new code feel 10x faster. U...
Huge thanks to Cursor, my coding IDE of choice. As someone who splits time between design and development, I love how Cursor speeds up the coding side of things. The built-in AI assistance makes it...
GPT Pilot
Very impressive! I knew what Zvonimir and the team were working on and was still floored when I saw the demo. The ability to basically write a tech spec from user requirements, then plan the projec...
This is an interesting idea! not sure how effective will be, but if it works then can solve the problem for many service companies out there. So I have a few questions. 1. Will it work for any fram...
Being able to offload 95% of coding tasks to AI seems awesome! What specific coding tasks can be automated with GPT Pilot? Keep up the great work and congratulations on the launch @zvonimir_sabljic1!
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cursor or GPT Pilot?
Based on FactScore™, Cursor leads with a score of 141.5 vs 45.2. Cursor has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Cursor compared to GPT Pilot?
Cursor uniquely offers: Seamless integration, Intelligent code suggestions, Code generation, Pair programming, AI autocomplete.
What are the pros of GPT Pilot compared to Cursor?
GPT Pilot uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is Cursor better rated than GPT Pilot?
Cursor is rated 5.0★ from 721 reviews. GPT Pilot is rated 5.0★ from 7 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Cursor and GPT Pilot?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Cursor scores 141.5 and GPT Pilot scores 45.2.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free