Features.Vote
Listen to your users. Know what to build next.
Flowith
AI for Deep Work
Updated February 2026
| Features.Vote | Flowith | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 4.5★ |
| Reviews | 14 | 2 |
| Pros | 8 | 2 |
| FactScore™ | 58.8 | 21.5 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Features.Vote — Pros
User feedback collection Easy setup Embed in site Feature prioritization Quick integration Free tier Roadmap management User engagementBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Flowith — Pros
Knowledge base creation Web clipperOnly in Features.Vote — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Flowith — Cons
Limited file type support Not suitable for scripting Not suitable for tradingDetails
| Features.Vote | Flowith | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Knowledge base software, Issue tracking software, User research | Knowledge base software, AI Chatbots |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | May 18, 2024 | August 7, 2024 |
| Website | features.vote | flowith.io |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Features.Vote if...
- User feedback collection
- Easy setup
- Embed in site
Choose Flowith if...
- Knowledge base creation
- Web clipper
With a FactScore™ of 58.8 vs 21.5, Features.Vote leads in community reception. Features.Vote uniquely offers User feedback collection and Easy setup, while Flowith stands out for Knowledge base creation and Web clipper.
What Users Say
Features.Vote
We've been using Features.vote for around a month now and I couldn't be happier. First of all, setting it up was really easy, even integrating it to our product took no more than 20 minutes. Second...
I’ve been using Features.Vote for my SaaS Supareels and it’s been extremely useful. It took only a few minutes to set up and still has all of the features I need. I also like that you can add a req...
I have been using Feature.Vote for two months. It has integrated into my own project very easily. It enables me to collect feedback easily and develop features that are truly cared about by users!
Flowith
Since AI lacks defensible moats, I’m choosing the best agent tool available today—plain and simple.
Only having interacted with it for a day or two the knowledge base creation is really impressive. When used in conjunction with the web clipper its solid./. I'd love to see more file types accepted.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Features.Vote or Flowith?
Based on FactScore™, Features.Vote leads with a score of 58.8 vs 21.5. Features.Vote has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.5★.
What are the pros of Features.Vote compared to Flowith?
Features.Vote uniquely offers: User feedback collection, Easy setup, Embed in site, Feature prioritization, Quick integration.
What are the pros of Flowith compared to Features.Vote?
Flowith uniquely offers: Knowledge base creation, Web clipper.
Is Features.Vote better rated than Flowith?
Features.Vote is rated 5.0★ from 14 reviews. Flowith is rated 4.5★ from 2 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Features.Vote and Flowith?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Features.Vote scores 58.8 and Flowith scores 21.5.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free