Features.Vote
Listen to your users. Know what to build next.
Ground News from the source
Compare Multiple News Sources
Updated February 2026
| Features.Vote | Ground News from the source | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 14 | 1 |
| Pros | 8 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 58.8 | 15.1 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Features.Vote — Pros
User feedback collection Easy setup Embed in site Feature prioritization Quick integration Free tier Roadmap management User engagementBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Ground News from the source — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in Features.Vote — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Ground News from the source — Cons
—Details
| Features.Vote | Ground News from the source | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Knowledge base software, Issue tracking software, User research | Knowledge base software, Social bookmarking, News |
| Platforms | Web | Web · iOS · Android |
| Became Popular | May 18, 2024 | April 23, 2018 |
| Website | features.vote | ground.news |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Features.Vote if...
- User feedback collection
- Easy setup
- Embed in site
Choose Ground News from the source if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 58.8 vs 15.1, Features.Vote leads in community reception. Features.Vote uniquely offers User feedback collection and Easy setup, while Ground News from the source stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
Features.Vote
We've been using Features.vote for around a month now and I couldn't be happier. First of all, setting it up was really easy, even integrating it to our product took no more than 20 minutes. Second...
I’ve been using Features.Vote for my SaaS Supareels and it’s been extremely useful. It took only a few minutes to set up and still has all of the features I need. I also like that you can add a req...
I have been using Feature.Vote for two months. It has integrated into my own project very easily. It enables me to collect feedback easily and develop features that are truly cared about by users!
Ground News from the source
Slowly becoming one of my favourite sources of current affairs. Allows you to clearly see which media covers what headlines and what kind of spin they may be applying. A great option for people who...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Features.Vote or Ground News from the source?
Based on FactScore™, Features.Vote leads with a score of 58.8 vs 15.1. Features.Vote has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Features.Vote compared to Ground News from the source?
Features.Vote uniquely offers: User feedback collection, Easy setup, Embed in site, Feature prioritization, Quick integration.
What are the pros of Ground News from the source compared to Features.Vote?
Ground News from the source uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is Features.Vote better rated than Ground News from the source?
Features.Vote is rated 5.0★ from 14 reviews. Ground News from the source is rated 5.0★ from 1 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Features.Vote and Ground News from the source?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Features.Vote scores 58.8 and Ground News from the source scores 15.1.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free