Flowbite
Open-source ecosystem built on top of Tailwind CSS
React
The library for web and native user interfaces
Updated February 2026
| Flowbite | React | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 12 | 157 |
| Pros | 10 | 16 |
| FactScore™ | 54.8 | 109.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Flowbite — Pros
Component library Tailwind integration Figma design system Free options Prebuilt templates Svelte support Wide range of components Framework agnostic Open sourceBoth tools — Pros
Excellent documentationOnly in React — Pros
Component-based architecture Dynamic user interfaces Flexibility Fast performance Large ecosystem Scalability Reusable components Strong community support Virtual DOM Easy learning curve Efficient rendering Modular development State management with hooks Developer experience JSXOnly in Flowbite — Cons
Incomplete React library Disorganized documentation Manual tweaks requiredBoth tools — Cons
Complex setupOnly in React — Cons
JSX love/hate relationshipDetails
| Flowbite | React | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Figma Templates, UI frameworks | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | May 20, 2021 | January 15, 2023 |
| Website | flowbite.com | react.dev |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Flowbite if...
- Component library
- Tailwind integration
- Figma design system
Choose React if...
- Component-based architecture
- Dynamic user interfaces
- Flexibility
With a FactScore™ of 54.8 vs 109.9, React leads in community reception. Flowbite uniquely offers Component library and Tailwind integration, while React stands out for Component-based architecture and Dynamic user interfaces.
What Users Say
Flowbite
I use the Svelte Flowbite component library. The components are not as well built as other component libraries but it is still a very solid option. In this case it was my designer who picked it for...
🚀 Flowbite increased our development time a lot here at Sage Marketer! Here’s why we love it: 🌟 Astonishing UI/UX Design: Flowbite blocks help create seamless and beautiful user interfaces effort...
Flowbite's customizable and accessible components allowed us to create a polished, consistent user interface that aligns with modern design standards. This saved us time and effort in building UI e...
React
React powers UniDeck’s intuitive interface, enabling a seamless and dynamic user experience for building dashboards without any coding. Its component-based architecture allowed us to rapidly protot...
We have worked on angular extensively in our last startup which was also very good, but for Tablesprint we went for react due to easy learning curve for new team members and for all it's components...
React powers our frontend because it strikes the right balance between flexibility and performance. It let us build a dynamic UI that supports drag-and-drop editing, real-time updates, and seamless...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Flowbite or React?
Based on FactScore™, React leads with a score of 109.9 vs 54.8. React has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.
What are the pros of Flowbite compared to React?
Flowbite uniquely offers: Component library, Tailwind integration, Figma design system, Free options, Prebuilt templates.
What are the pros of React compared to Flowbite?
React uniquely offers: Component-based architecture, Dynamic user interfaces, Flexibility, Fast performance, Large ecosystem.
Is Flowbite better rated than React?
Flowbite is rated 4.9★ from 12 reviews. React is rated 5.0★ from 157 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Flowbite and React?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Flowbite scores 54.8 and React scores 109.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free