◯˚GitStart
Pull Requests as a Service
tiddlywiki
A non-linear personal web notebook
Updated February 2026
| ◯˚GitStart | tiddlywiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 12 | 15 |
| Pros | 12 | 13 |
| FactScore™ | 54.8 | 60.2 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in ◯˚GitStart — Pros
Responsive support On demand developers Quality code output Scalable development Support for tech stack Team collaboration Bug tracking Cost effective Developer skill development Project management Recruitment assistance Smooth integrationBoth tools — Pros
—Only in tiddlywiki — Pros
Flexible Reliable Community support Customizable Powerful knowledge management Portable Single html file Versatile Hyper-extensible Spaced repetition Feature-rich Future safe Open sourceOnly in ◯˚GitStart — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in tiddlywiki — Cons
Steep learning curveDetails
| ◯˚GitStart | tiddlywiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Project management software, AI Coding Agents, Code Review Tools | Note and writing apps, Project management software, Website builders |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | October 3, 2019 | October 17, 2017 |
| Website | gitstart.com | tiddlywiki.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose ◯˚GitStart if...
- Responsive support
- On demand developers
- Quality code output
Choose tiddlywiki if...
- Flexible
- Reliable
- Community support
With a FactScore™ of 54.8 vs 60.2, tiddlywiki leads in community reception. ◯˚GitStart uniquely offers Responsive support and On demand developers, while tiddlywiki stands out for Flexible and Reliable.
What Users Say
◯˚GitStart
We've used Gitstart to augment our developer bandwidth at codewp.ai for a few months (working on platform rebuild / launch). It's a great offering. The founder, Hamza, and our support team are very...
At Hospitable.com we started using GitStart over the last few months, they worked with us to find a team that supported our tech stack and it's been great so far. The team have been quick to unders...
Wow, GitStart sounds like a game-changer for managing pull requests! The idea of assigning tickets and getting back PRs while only paying for the code that gets merged is brilliant. It aligns to op...
tiddlywiki
The learning curve is so steep you might want to drop it at the very beginning. But don't be deceived! Once you get a hang of how tiddlers work and set up a system that matches your workflow, the p...
Did your favorite reading software disappear overnight (rhymes with Rocket) ? Or maybe your "free" information manager decided to start charging you the equivalent of an automobile payment (rhymes ...
TiddlyWiki can be a simple journal that somehow keeps memories local to your devices and easy to find for 20 years, or a personal in-browser app framework, if you're susceptible to nerd sniping. Us...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, ◯˚GitStart or tiddlywiki?
Based on FactScore™, tiddlywiki leads with a score of 60.2 vs 54.8. tiddlywiki has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.
What are the pros of ◯˚GitStart compared to tiddlywiki?
◯˚GitStart uniquely offers: Responsive support, On demand developers, Quality code output, Scalable development, Support for tech stack.
What are the pros of tiddlywiki compared to ◯˚GitStart?
tiddlywiki uniquely offers: Flexible, Reliable, Community support, Customizable, Powerful knowledge management.
Is ◯˚GitStart better rated than tiddlywiki?
◯˚GitStart is rated 4.9★ from 12 reviews. tiddlywiki is rated 5.0★ from 15 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of ◯˚GitStart and tiddlywiki?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. ◯˚GitStart scores 54.8 and tiddlywiki scores 60.2.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free