LiveKit
The open source platform for real-time communication
Zerve AI
What if Jupyter + Figma + VSCode had a baby?
Updated February 2026
| LiveKit | Zerve AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 28 | 35 |
| Pros | 15 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 72.7 | 77.8 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in LiveKit — Pros
Real-time communication Low-latency Audio streaming Flexibility High-quality video infrastructure Open source Signaling and session management Voice AI integration Developer-friendly Excellent documentation Pre-built React components Real-time API Real-time state management Scalable SDK support in various languagesBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Zerve AI — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in LiveKit — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Zerve AI — Cons
—Details
| LiveKit | Zerve AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Team collaboration software, Video conferencing, Video and Voice calling, Realtime Voice AI, AI Voice Agent Infrastructure | Project management software, Team collaboration software, Data analysis tools, Data visualization tools, AI Infrastructure Tools |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | July 8, 2021 | January 30, 2024 |
| Website | livekit.io | zerve.ai |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose LiveKit if...
- Real-time communication
- Low-latency
- Audio streaming
Choose Zerve AI if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 72.7 vs 77.8, Zerve AI leads in community reception. LiveKit uniquely offers Real-time communication and Low-latency, while Zerve AI stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
LiveKit
We use LiveKit as the orchestrator for everything voice-related in our platform — from real-time conversations to AI-driven phone calls. It handles signaling, session management, and audio streamin...
We use LiveKit for managed video streaming infrastructure and also use LiveKit agents as basis for our conversational agents. WebRTC streaming is really hard and LiveKit provides a great developer-...
Great library and infrastructure for building real time audio and video. Exceptional documentation and SDK support in various languages make LiveKit a great choice for live audio and video.
Zerve AI
This is a phenomenon concept! Just curious, how does deployment process work for multiple different languages and coding environments?
It is the best app to be used across different teams working on same solution. As a quality R&D manager, I feel this helps to develop and validate end to end solutions. Looking forward to utili...
With its Figma-like collaboration features and VSCode-esque engineering controls, teams can collaborate safely and efficiently. Plus, the ability to parallelize code blocks eliminates the wait time...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, LiveKit or Zerve AI?
Based on FactScore™, Zerve AI leads with a score of 77.8 vs 72.7. Zerve AI has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of LiveKit compared to Zerve AI?
LiveKit uniquely offers: Real-time communication, Low-latency, Audio streaming, Flexibility, High-quality video infrastructure.
What are the pros of Zerve AI compared to LiveKit?
Zerve AI uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is LiveKit better rated than Zerve AI?
LiveKit is rated 5.0★ from 28 reviews. Zerve AI is rated 5.0★ from 35 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of LiveKit and Zerve AI?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. LiveKit scores 72.7 and Zerve AI scores 77.8.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free