PATR

Deploy Your Web Application In 60 Seconds.

★★★★★ 5.0/5
FactScore™ 60.2
VS

Shipixen

Create a blog & landing page in minutes

★★★★★ 5.0/5
FactScore™ 50

Updated February 2026

PATR Shipixen
Rating 5.0★ 5.0★
Reviews 15 9
Pros 13 12
FactScore™ 60.2 50

FactScore™ Comparison

FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.

👑
60.2
PATR FactScore™
★ PATR wins on FactScore™
50
Shipixen FactScore™

Pros & Cons

Only in PATR — Pros

Easy to use interface Fast performance Simple deployment process DevOps simplification Comprehensive platform Fast deployment Responsive support API token management Bring your own cloud provider Direct developer communication One-click deployment Scalable Transparent revenue display

Both tools — Pros

Only in Shipixen — Pros

Easy to use components Next.js boilerplate Time-saving Actionable insights Detailed reports Eliminates manual tasks Fast setup Focus on strategic initiatives Intuitive navigation Potential CMS integration Production-ready Quick onboarding

Only in PATR — Cons

Limited database options Limited region options Role based access control

Both tools — Cons

Only in Shipixen — Cons

Distinguishing from competitors Limited CMS options

Details

PATR Shipixen
Categories Static site generators, Databases and backend frameworks, Cloud Computing Platforms Website builders, No-code Platforms, Static site generators, Landing page builders, Blogging platforms
Platforms Web Web
Became Popular July 13, 2022 November 20, 2023
Website bit.ly shipixen.com

Who Should Pick Which?

Choose PATR if...

  • Easy to use interface
  • Fast performance
  • Simple deployment process

Choose Shipixen if...

  • Easy to use components
  • Next.js boilerplate
  • Time-saving

With a FactScore™ of 60.2 vs 50, PATR leads in community reception. PATR uniquely offers Easy to use interface and Fast performance, while Shipixen stands out for Easy to use components and Next.js boilerplate.

3

What Users Say

PATR

N
Nika Mar 20, 2023
★★★★★

Congratulation on the Launch! Your KPIs so far are incredible. There is no doubt your platform is already prosperous. I am perceived you will get the best possible results!

S
Shrilatha Dec 8, 2022
★★★★★

Great ! it's easy-peasy software for developers like us.....

M
Madza Mar 20, 2023
★★★★★

Awesome product, would definitely recommend!

Shipixen

M
Marcel Feb 26, 2024
★★★★★

This is just pure gold and even you are not into Next.Js or similar this makes it a blessing to start with. Would love to see some sort of CMS Templates to add in like (sanity,buttercms etc.) to ma...

D
Dan Jul 11, 2024
★★★★★

I made the landing page & docs for Page UI in a couple of hours thanks to Shipixen.

D
Dima Sep 3, 2024
★★★★★

Our Landing Page is built with Shipixen! With all components you need to build a landing page this tool is an absolute no-brainer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, PATR or Shipixen?

Based on FactScore™, PATR leads with a score of 60.2 vs 50. PATR has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.

What are the pros of PATR compared to Shipixen?

PATR uniquely offers: Easy to use interface, Fast performance, Simple deployment process, DevOps simplification, Comprehensive platform.

What are the pros of Shipixen compared to PATR?

Shipixen uniquely offers: Easy to use components, Next.js boilerplate, Time-saving, Actionable insights, Detailed reports.

Is PATR better rated than Shipixen?

PATR is rated 5.0★ from 15 reviews. Shipixen is rated 5.0★ from 9 reviews.

What is the FactScore™ of PATR and Shipixen?

FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. PATR scores 60.2 and Shipixen scores 50.

Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos

The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.

Try FactCheckTool Free