Pinecone
Build knowledgeable AI
PostgreSQL
A powerful, open source object-relational database system
Updated February 2026
| Pinecone | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 67 | 74 |
| Pros | 14 | 19 |
| FactScore™ | 89.8 | 93.8 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Pinecone — Pros
Ease of use High-performance vector database AI integration Cost effective Efficient vector search Fast performance Developer-friendly Serverless architecture Fully managed Reliable Context aware Semantic accuracy Simple APIBoth tools — Pros
ScalabilityOnly in PostgreSQL — Pros
Reliability Performance Advanced features Open source Advanced indexing Pgvector extension Extensibility Complex queries JSON support Robust transaction support SQL compliance Strong community support Structured data management Data integrity Easy to scale Free Geospatial analysis High loads handlingOnly in Pinecone — Cons
Closed source Limited index typesBoth tools — Cons
—Only in PostgreSQL — Cons
—Details
| Pinecone | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Databases and backend frameworks, AI Infrastructure Tools, Cloud Computing Platforms, AI Databases | Data visualization tools, Databases and backend frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | April 22, 2023 | N/A |
| Website | www.pinecone.io | www.postgresql.org |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Pinecone if...
- Ease of use
- High-performance vector database
- AI integration
Choose PostgreSQL if...
- Reliability
- Performance
- Advanced features
With a FactScore™ of 89.8 vs 93.8, PostgreSQL leads in community reception. Pinecone uniquely offers Ease of use and High-performance vector database, while PostgreSQL stands out for Reliability and Performance.
What Users Say
Pinecone
We used Pinecone for fast, scalable vector search to power NeuraVid’s AI-driven video retrieval. Unlike traditional databases, Pinecone is optimized for vector searches (ANN - Approximate Nearest N...
We use Pinecone as our vector database to power Glasp’s AI Clone and Learning Memory. It’s incredibly fast, scalable, and reliable—perfect for managing embeddings from users’ highlights and notes. ...
We rely on Pinecone to enhance Lambda's AI-driven data insights and semantic search capabilities. Its scalable and efficient vector database allows us to manage and query large datasets with precis...
PostgreSQL
Postgres stands out thanks to its rock‑solid reliability and rich feature set—think advanced indexing, robust JSON support, and strong concurrency. It’s open source, highly scalable, and keeps our ...
I prefer PostgreSQL because it's just such an incredibly robust and versatile relational database that I trust. The huge advantage, especially for AI and search stuff lately, is the pgvector extens...
PGVector's native vector operations with PostgreSQL's ACID compliance works perfectly. We're storing millions of embeddings with sub-millisecond similarity search using cosine distance. The async c...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Pinecone or PostgreSQL?
Based on FactScore™, PostgreSQL leads with a score of 93.8 vs 89.8. PostgreSQL has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.
What are the pros of Pinecone compared to PostgreSQL?
Pinecone uniquely offers: Ease of use, High-performance vector database, AI integration, Cost effective, Efficient vector search.
What are the pros of PostgreSQL compared to Pinecone?
PostgreSQL uniquely offers: Reliability, Performance, Advanced features, Open source, Advanced indexing.
Is Pinecone better rated than PostgreSQL?
Pinecone is rated 4.9★ from 67 reviews. PostgreSQL is rated 5.0★ from 74 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Pinecone and PostgreSQL?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Pinecone scores 89.8 and PostgreSQL scores 93.8.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free