Pixabay
Stunning free images & royalty free stock
Snappr
The easiest way to book a great photographer
FactScore™ 0Updated February 2026
| Pixabay | Snappr | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | N/A |
| Reviews | 1 | 0 |
| Pros | 0 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 15.1 | 0 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Pixabay — Pros
No unique pros listedBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Snappr — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in Pixabay — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Snappr — Cons
—Details
| Pixabay | Snappr | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Stock photo sites, Photo sharing, Video hosting platforms | Photo sharing, Professional networking platforms, Travel Planning |
| Platforms | Web · iOS · Android | Web |
| Became Popular | February 25, 2015 | June 28, 2016 |
| Website | pixabay.com | www.snappr.co |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Pixabay if...
- No unique pros listed
Choose Snappr if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 15.1 vs 0, Pixabay leads in community reception. Pixabay uniquely offers No unique pros listed, while Snappr stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
Pixabay
Love it, great tool for designers or anyone who is working with imagery
Snappr
No reviews yet
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Pixabay or Snappr?
Based on FactScore™, Pixabay leads with a score of 15.1 vs 0. Pixabay has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to N/A★.
What are the pros of Pixabay compared to Snappr?
Pixabay uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
What are the pros of Snappr compared to Pixabay?
Snappr uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is Pixabay better rated than Snappr?
Pixabay is rated 5.0★ from 1 reviews. Snappr is rated N/A★ from 0 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Pixabay and Snappr?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Pixabay scores 15.1 and Snappr scores 0.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free