Polar
Open source monetization platform for developers
Throne 2.0
Privacy-first gifting platform for creators
Updated February 2026
| Polar | Throne 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 20 | 5 |
| Pros | 7 | 13 |
| FactScore™ | 66.1 | 38.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Polar — Pros
Open source Developer-centric Actively developed Cost-effective Modern design Seamless integration Transparent pricingBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Throne 2.0 — Pros
Creator-centric Fan-to-creator gifting Privacy focus Wishlist creation Amazon Wishlist import Community support Easy setup Global gifting infrastructure No issues reported Social media integration Store front option Support for smaller creators Twitch integrationOnly in Polar — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Throne 2.0 — Cons
Lack of exposure for non-paying usersDetails
| Polar | Throne 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Ecommerce platforms, Payment processors | Ecommerce platforms, Social Networking, Community management |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | September 5, 2024 | June 9, 2023 |
| Website | polar.sh | throne.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Polar if...
- Open source
- Developer-centric
- Actively developed
Choose Throne 2.0 if...
- Creator-centric
- Fan-to-creator gifting
- Privacy focus
With a FactScore™ of 66.1 vs 38.9, Polar leads in community reception. Polar uniquely offers Open source and Developer-centric, while Throne 2.0 stands out for Creator-centric and Fan-to-creator gifting.
What Users Say
Polar
Polar understands SaaS pricing for developers. Their webhook system is reliable, customer portal is built-in, and founder pricing tiers were trivial to implement. Better developer experience than S...
We love Polar because it makes scaling globally effortless. Subscriptions, payments, and taxes just work out of the box, so we can focus on growing Dreambase instead of wrangling billing complexity.
Love the open-source approach and transparent pricing. Great for indie founders and anyone who wants full control over monetization.
Throne 2.0
Congrats Patrice and the Throne team! The transformation of the fan-to-creator relationship through tangible gifting is an intriguing spin on a well-established system. What's captivating here is t...
Hello! I really love your product. Is it okay if I add this to my website? pitchfork.vercel.app . It is a platform where people can post products and pitches. Thank you so much. Cool product and aw...
I am a big believer in gifting and love that fact that someone came up with this provocative concept and brought it to life.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Polar or Throne 2.0?
Based on FactScore™, Polar leads with a score of 66.1 vs 38.9. Polar has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Polar compared to Throne 2.0?
Polar uniquely offers: Open source, Developer-centric, Actively developed, Cost-effective, Modern design.
What are the pros of Throne 2.0 compared to Polar?
Throne 2.0 uniquely offers: Creator-centric, Fan-to-creator gifting, Privacy focus, Wishlist creation, Amazon Wishlist import.
Is Polar better rated than Throne 2.0?
Polar is rated 5.0★ from 20 reviews. Throne 2.0 is rated 5.0★ from 5 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Polar and Throne 2.0?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Polar scores 66.1 and Throne 2.0 scores 38.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free