React
The library for web and native user interfaces
Wasp
Develop web apps in React & Node.js with no boilerplate
Updated February 2026
| React | Wasp | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 4.9★ |
| Reviews | 157 | 12 |
| Pros | 16 | 5 |
| FactScore™ | 109.9 | 54.8 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in React — Pros
Component-based architecture Dynamic user interfaces Flexibility Fast performance Large ecosystem Scalability Reusable components Strong community support Virtual DOM Easy learning curve Efficient rendering Excellent documentation Modular development State management with hooks Developer experience JSXBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Wasp — Pros
Simplifies full-stack development Solo developer friendly Fast app generation Fast development Potential for AI integrationOnly in React — Cons
Complex setup JSX love/hate relationshipBoth tools — Cons
—Only in Wasp — Cons
Beta stage Lack of hosting options No web IDEDetails
| React | Wasp | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks | UI frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | January 15, 2023 | December 6, 2020 |
| Website | react.dev | wasp.sh |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose React if...
- Component-based architecture
- Dynamic user interfaces
- Flexibility
Choose Wasp if...
- Simplifies full-stack development
- Solo developer friendly
- Fast app generation
With a FactScore™ of 109.9 vs 54.8, React leads in community reception. React uniquely offers Component-based architecture and Dynamic user interfaces, while Wasp stands out for Simplifies full-stack development and Solo developer friendly.
What Users Say
React
React powers UniDeck’s intuitive interface, enabling a seamless and dynamic user experience for building dashboards without any coding. Its component-based architecture allowed us to rapidly protot...
We have worked on angular extensively in our last startup which was also very good, but for Tablesprint we went for react due to easy learning curve for new team members and for all it's components...
React powers our frontend because it strikes the right balance between flexibility and performance. It let us build a dynamic UI that supports drag-and-drop editing, real-time updates, and seamless...
Wasp
This project was built using Wasp! I had never used it before and found it to simplify so many things that are usually a big headache when creating full-stack apps from scratch. Definitely recommen...
The Wasp team keep putting out awesome stuff. Really fast generation. I generated a badminton tips site https://magic-app-generator.wasp... Looks really cool
Wasp enabled me to develop my entire application as a solo programmer. I recommend it to other solo developers looking to quickly create full-stack websites with React and Node.js.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, React or Wasp?
Based on FactScore™, React leads with a score of 109.9 vs 54.8. React has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.
What are the pros of React compared to Wasp?
React uniquely offers: Component-based architecture, Dynamic user interfaces, Flexibility, Fast performance, Large ecosystem.
What are the pros of Wasp compared to React?
Wasp uniquely offers: Simplifies full-stack development, Solo developer friendly, Fast app generation, Fast development, Potential for AI integration.
Is React better rated than Wasp?
React is rated 5.0★ from 157 reviews. Wasp is rated 4.9★ from 12 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of React and Wasp?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. React scores 109.9 and Wasp scores 54.8.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free