React
The library for web and native user interfaces
Zeabur
Deploy painlessly and scale infinitely with just one click
Updated February 2026
| React | Zeabur | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 4.6★ |
| Reviews | 157 | 11 |
| Pros | 16 | 19 |
| FactScore™ | 109.9 | 50.1 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in React — Pros
Component-based architecture Dynamic user interfaces Fast performance Large ecosystem Scalability Reusable components Strong community support Virtual DOM Easy learning curve Efficient rendering Excellent documentation Modular development State management with hooks JSXBoth tools — Pros
Flexibility Developer experienceOnly in Zeabur — Pros
Easy to use One-click deployment Fast deployment AI-assisted coding workflows Auto-scaling Cool interface Discord community support Focus on development High support for website construction Marketplace One-click clone and migration Production-level stability Reasonable pricing Responsive customer service Service templates for one-click deployment Usage based pricing User-friendly payment methodOnly in React — Cons
Complex setup JSX love/hate relationshipBoth tools — Cons
—Only in Zeabur — Cons
Hidden costs Lack of transparent pricingDetails
| React | Zeabur | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks | Engineering & Development, Web hosting services, Platforms, Cloud Computing Platforms |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | January 15, 2023 | July 23, 2023 |
| Website | react.dev | zeabur.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose React if...
- Component-based architecture
- Dynamic user interfaces
- Fast performance
Choose Zeabur if...
- Easy to use
- One-click deployment
- Fast deployment
With a FactScore™ of 109.9 vs 50.1, React leads in community reception. React uniquely offers Component-based architecture and Dynamic user interfaces, while Zeabur stands out for Easy to use and One-click deployment.
What Users Say
React
React powers UniDeck’s intuitive interface, enabling a seamless and dynamic user experience for building dashboards without any coding. Its component-based architecture allowed us to rapidly protot...
We have worked on angular extensively in our last startup which was also very good, but for Tablesprint we went for react due to easy learning curve for new team members and for all it's components...
React powers our frontend because it strikes the right balance between flexibility and performance. It let us build a dynamic UI that supports drag-and-drop editing, real-time updates, and seamless...
Zeabur
Glad to see the formal launch of Zeabur As a user of Zeabur, it's extremely easy for developers/startups to build apps and services based on Zeabur. It makes you focus on your development of featur...
The integration between Zeabur and GitHub is fantastic, though there are similar alternatives available. I usually use it as it relatively fits my usage habits better 👀
Shout out for making the deployment process not a PITA!
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, React or Zeabur?
Based on FactScore™, React leads with a score of 109.9 vs 50.1. React has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.6★.
What are the pros of React compared to Zeabur?
React uniquely offers: Component-based architecture, Dynamic user interfaces, Fast performance, Large ecosystem, Scalability.
What are the pros of Zeabur compared to React?
Zeabur uniquely offers: Easy to use, One-click deployment, Fast deployment, AI-assisted coding workflows, Auto-scaling.
Is React better rated than Zeabur?
React is rated 5.0★ from 157 reviews. Zeabur is rated 4.6★ from 11 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of React and Zeabur?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. React scores 109.9 and Zeabur scores 50.1.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free