Astro
The web framework that scales with you.
Solid
AI that builds real web apps
Updated February 2026
| Astro | Solid | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 4.6★ |
| Reviews | 44 | 9 |
| Pros | 19 | 8 |
| FactScore™ | 82.7 | 45.6 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Astro — Pros
Fast performance Excellent developer experience Static site generation Easy setup Easy to learn Content-driven websites Flexible deployment Island architecture Lightweight build Markdown support Starlight theme Templates availability Zero JS by default Full-stack development Modular architecture Partial hydration Supports multiple frameworks View transitions Vite coreBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Solid — Pros
Extendable code Node.js support Production-grade code React support Real backend Migratable code Postgres support Vibe codingOnly in Astro — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Solid — Cons
Credit system Error handlingDetails
| Astro | Solid | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Website builders, Static site generators | Website builders, Vibe Coding Tools, No-Code Website Builder |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | November 8, 2022 | September 8, 2025 |
| Website | astro.build | Trysolid.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Astro if...
- Fast performance
- Excellent developer experience
- Static site generation
Choose Solid if...
- Extendable code
- Node.js support
- Production-grade code
With a FactScore™ of 82.7 vs 45.6, Astro leads in community reception. Astro uniquely offers Fast performance and Excellent developer experience, while Solid stands out for Extendable code and Node.js support.
What Users Say
Astro
I've used many content-driven web frameworks, but Astro is the one that hits the sweet spot for me. Not only is it very easy to use, but it also includes everything I need to create a blog or a lan...
I wanted a way to make Blankie a great website without a lot of upkeep, and Astro delivered. The Vite core underneath it all generates such a clean static site and I'm thrilled that the site is 100...
Our UI framework for a fast, minimal JS experience. Astro’s island architecture lets us ship a responsive dashboard with React where it counts, and static where it’s best perfect for an ops heavy t...
Solid
This looks super promising 👏 Love that Solid goes beyond prototypes and actually generates production-grade full-stack apps (Node.js, React, TypeScript). That’s a big step up compared to most AI b...
🚀 Huge fan of Solid’s “real app, real code” stance. This isn’t another toy demo—React + Node.js + Postgres with clean, ownable code you can extend and migrate. If you’ve hit the Lovable/Base44 cei...
I love this solution, i recommend it :)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Astro or Solid?
Based on FactScore™, Astro leads with a score of 82.7 vs 45.6. Astro has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.6★.
What are the pros of Astro compared to Solid?
Astro uniquely offers: Fast performance, Excellent developer experience, Static site generation, Easy setup, Easy to learn.
What are the pros of Solid compared to Astro?
Solid uniquely offers: Extendable code, Node.js support, Production-grade code, React support, Real backend.
Is Astro better rated than Solid?
Astro is rated 5.0★ from 44 reviews. Solid is rated 4.6★ from 9 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Astro and Solid?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Astro scores 82.7 and Solid scores 45.6.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free