Bito

Codebase intelligence for AI coding and reviews

★★★★★ 4.9/5
FactScore™ 56.4
VS

Codex by OpenAI

AI that writes code for you

★★★★★ 5.0/5
FactScore™ 66.1

Updated February 2026

Bito Codex by OpenAI
Rating 4.9★ 5.0★
Reviews 13 20
Pros 17 0
FactScore™ 56.4 66.1

FactScore™ Comparison

FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.

56.4
Bito FactScore™
👑
66.1
Codex by OpenAI FactScore™
★ Codex by OpenAI wins on FactScore™

Pros & Cons

Only in Bito — Pros

Enhances productivity AI code reviews Improves code quality Fast performance Catches critical bugs Suggests code improvements Context aware Multi-language support Accelerates development Code review analytics Codebase aware Custom code review rules Easy setup GitHub integration Reduces repetitive work Secure SOC 2 Type II certified

Both tools — Pros

Only in Codex by OpenAI — Pros

No unique pros listed

Only in Bito — Cons

Not a replacement for human reviews

Both tools — Cons

Only in Codex by OpenAI — Cons

Details

Bito Codex by OpenAI
Categories AI Coding Agents, AI Chatbots, Code Review Tools AI Coding Agents
Platforms Web Web
Became Popular April 4, 2023 August 10, 2021
Website bito.ai openai.com

Who Should Pick Which?

Choose Bito if...

  • Enhances productivity
  • AI code reviews
  • Improves code quality

Choose Codex by OpenAI if...

  • No unique pros listed

With a FactScore™ of 56.4 vs 66.1, Codex by OpenAI leads in community reception. Bito uniquely offers Enhances productivity and AI code reviews, while Codex by OpenAI stands out for No unique pros listed.

3

What Users Say

Bito

A
Alexander Jun 27, 2025
★★★★★

Big fan of what the team at Bito are building. With an astute focus on quality and customizability, its AI code review agent feels and works as promised: helping teams ship faster, better code.

N
Navaneeth Feb 11, 2025
★★★★★

Accelerated our development by suggesting code patterns.

R
Ravi Sep 3, 2025
★★★★★

I’ve been using Bito for code reviews and it’s honestly a game-changer. The feedback is clear, fast, and actually helpful instead of generic. It catches small issues I’d normally overlook and even ...

Codex by OpenAI

J
JJ Sep 30, 2025
★★★★★

Even with new models around, Codex remains one of the most reliable AI coding assistants—fast, structured, and still very useful.

W
Wojciech Oct 30, 2025
★★★★★

Still the fastest way to get a working regex or a complex utility function from a single-line comment.

T
Tadashi Jan 4, 2026
★★★★★

OpenAI Codex has become an essential part of our development workflow. With our AGENTS.md providing project context, Codex understands our monorepo architecture and coding conventions, autonomously...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Bito or Codex by OpenAI?

Based on FactScore™, Codex by OpenAI leads with a score of 66.1 vs 56.4. Codex by OpenAI has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.

What are the pros of Bito compared to Codex by OpenAI?

Bito uniquely offers: Enhances productivity, AI code reviews, Improves code quality, Fast performance, Catches critical bugs.

What are the pros of Codex by OpenAI compared to Bito?

Codex by OpenAI uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.

Is Bito better rated than Codex by OpenAI?

Bito is rated 4.9★ from 13 reviews. Codex by OpenAI is rated 5.0★ from 20 reviews.

What is the FactScore™ of Bito and Codex by OpenAI?

FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Bito scores 56.4 and Codex by OpenAI scores 66.1.

Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos

The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.

Try FactCheckTool Free