Features.Vote
Listen to your users. Know what to build next.
Minerva
A better way to share processes online
Updated February 2026
| Features.Vote | Minerva | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 3.5★ |
| Reviews | 14 | 2 |
| Pros | 8 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 58.8 | 16.7 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Features.Vote — Pros
User feedback collection Easy setup Embed in site Feature prioritization Quick integration Free tier Roadmap management User engagementBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Minerva — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in Features.Vote — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Minerva — Cons
—Details
| Features.Vote | Minerva | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Knowledge base software, Issue tracking software, User research | Knowledge base software, Chrome Extensions |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | May 18, 2024 | August 24, 2020 |
| Website | features.vote | www.minervaknows.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Features.Vote if...
- User feedback collection
- Easy setup
- Embed in site
Choose Minerva if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 58.8 vs 16.7, Features.Vote leads in community reception. Features.Vote uniquely offers User feedback collection and Easy setup, while Minerva stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
Features.Vote
We've been using Features.vote for around a month now and I couldn't be happier. First of all, setting it up was really easy, even integrating it to our product took no more than 20 minutes. Second...
I’ve been using Features.Vote for my SaaS Supareels and it’s been extremely useful. It took only a few minutes to set up and still has all of the features I need. I also like that you can add a req...
I have been using Feature.Vote for two months. It has integrated into my own project very easily. It enables me to collect feedback easily and develop features that are truly cared about by users!
Minerva
I've been watching @joaquin_roca patiently iterate on this product for years and I've never seen him more excited than right now. As a founder who runs a product - kumospace.com - that is used all ...
I want to love this platform so badly. The interactivity of the guides fits my industry and use-case perfectly. However, it's just way too laggy and seems to struggle with resource management. I wa...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Features.Vote or Minerva?
Based on FactScore™, Features.Vote leads with a score of 58.8 vs 16.7. Features.Vote has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 3.5★.
What are the pros of Features.Vote compared to Minerva?
Features.Vote uniquely offers: User feedback collection, Easy setup, Embed in site, Feature prioritization, Quick integration.
What are the pros of Minerva compared to Features.Vote?
Minerva uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is Features.Vote better rated than Minerva?
Features.Vote is rated 5.0★ from 14 reviews. Minerva is rated 3.5★ from 2 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Features.Vote and Minerva?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Features.Vote scores 58.8 and Minerva scores 16.7.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free