Features.Vote
Listen to your users. Know what to build next.
Open Paper
A workbench for academic literature review
Updated February 2026
| Features.Vote | Open Paper | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 14 | 1 |
| Pros | 8 | 0 |
| FactScore™ | 58.8 | 15.1 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Features.Vote — Pros
User feedback collection Easy setup Embed in site Feature prioritization Quick integration Free tier Roadmap management User engagementBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Open Paper — Pros
No unique pros listedOnly in Features.Vote — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Open Paper — Cons
—Details
| Features.Vote | Open Paper | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Knowledge base software, Issue tracking software, User research | Knowledge base software, File storage and sharing apps, Search |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | May 18, 2024 | May 31, 2025 |
| Website | features.vote | openpaper.ai |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Features.Vote if...
- User feedback collection
- Easy setup
- Embed in site
Choose Open Paper if...
- No unique pros listed
With a FactScore™ of 58.8 vs 15.1, Features.Vote leads in community reception. Features.Vote uniquely offers User feedback collection and Easy setup, while Open Paper stands out for No unique pros listed.
What Users Say
Features.Vote
We've been using Features.vote for around a month now and I couldn't be happier. First of all, setting it up was really easy, even integrating it to our product took no more than 20 minutes. Second...
I’ve been using Features.Vote for my SaaS Supareels and it’s been extremely useful. It took only a few minutes to set up and still has all of the features I need. I also like that you can add a req...
I have been using Feature.Vote for two months. It has integrated into my own project very easily. It enables me to collect feedback easily and develop features that are truly cared about by users!
Open Paper
Effective reading and efficient synthesis during R&D, even using it for audio briefings while people in office roles are commuting, overall it is working fine.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Features.Vote or Open Paper?
Based on FactScore™, Features.Vote leads with a score of 58.8 vs 15.1. Features.Vote has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Features.Vote compared to Open Paper?
Features.Vote uniquely offers: User feedback collection, Easy setup, Embed in site, Feature prioritization, Quick integration.
What are the pros of Open Paper compared to Features.Vote?
Open Paper uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
Is Features.Vote better rated than Open Paper?
Features.Vote is rated 5.0★ from 14 reviews. Open Paper is rated 5.0★ from 1 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Features.Vote and Open Paper?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Features.Vote scores 58.8 and Open Paper scores 15.1.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free