Dyte
Integrate live experiences into your product within minutes
LiveKit
The open source platform for real-time communication
Updated February 2026
| Dyte | LiveKit | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 17 | 28 |
| Pros | 15 | 15 |
| FactScore™ | 62.8 | 72.7 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Dyte — Pros
Easy integration Excellent support Developer friendly APIs Live streaming Customizable layouts Lightweight Quick onboarding User-friendly plugins Video conferencing Developer friendly support Easy to schedule meetings Interactive features Ready-to-use UI kits Robust infrastructureBoth tools — Pros
Excellent documentationOnly in LiveKit — Pros
Real-time communication Low-latency Audio streaming Flexibility High-quality video infrastructure Open source Signaling and session management Voice AI integration Developer-friendly Pre-built React components Real-time API Real-time state management Scalable SDK support in various languagesOnly in Dyte — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in LiveKit — Cons
—Details
| Dyte | LiveKit | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Team collaboration software, Video conferencing, Video and Voice calling | Team collaboration software, Video conferencing, Video and Voice calling, Realtime Voice AI, AI Voice Agent Infrastructure |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | January 30, 2023 | July 8, 2021 |
| Website | dyte.io | livekit.io |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Dyte if...
- Easy integration
- Excellent support
- Developer friendly APIs
Choose LiveKit if...
- Real-time communication
- Low-latency
- Audio streaming
With a FactScore™ of 62.8 vs 72.7, LiveKit leads in community reception. Dyte uniquely offers Easy integration and Excellent support, while LiveKit stands out for Real-time communication and Low-latency.
What Users Say
Dyte
No reviews yet
LiveKit
We use LiveKit as the orchestrator for everything voice-related in our platform — from real-time conversations to AI-driven phone calls. It handles signaling, session management, and audio streamin...
We use LiveKit for managed video streaming infrastructure and also use LiveKit agents as basis for our conversational agents. WebRTC streaming is really hard and LiveKit provides a great developer-...
Great library and infrastructure for building real time audio and video. Exceptional documentation and SDK support in various languages make LiveKit a great choice for live audio and video.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Dyte or LiveKit?
Based on FactScore™, LiveKit leads with a score of 72.7 vs 62.8. LiveKit has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Dyte compared to LiveKit?
Dyte uniquely offers: Easy integration, Excellent support, Developer friendly APIs, Live streaming, Customizable layouts.
What are the pros of LiveKit compared to Dyte?
LiveKit uniquely offers: Real-time communication, Low-latency, Audio streaming, Flexibility, High-quality video infrastructure.
Is Dyte better rated than LiveKit?
Dyte is rated 5.0★ from 17 reviews. LiveKit is rated 5.0★ from 28 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Dyte and LiveKit?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Dyte scores 62.8 and LiveKit scores 72.7.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free