PocketBase
Open Source realtime backend in 1 file
PostgreSQL
A powerful, open source object-relational database system
Updated February 2026
| PocketBase | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 6 | 74 |
| Pros | 11 | 19 |
| FactScore™ | 42.3 | 93.8 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in PocketBase — Pros
Self-hosting capability Authentication system Lightweight Simple setup Cost-effective Database management Developer-friendly Fast performance File storage Realtime databaseBoth tools — Pros
Open sourceOnly in PostgreSQL — Pros
Reliability Performance Scalability Advanced features Advanced indexing Pgvector extension Extensibility Complex queries JSON support Robust transaction support SQL compliance Strong community support Structured data management Data integrity Easy to scale Free Geospatial analysis High loads handlingOnly in PocketBase — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in PostgreSQL — Cons
—Details
| PocketBase | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Databases and backend frameworks | Data visualization tools, Databases and backend frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | July 8, 2022 | N/A |
| Website | pocketbase.io | www.postgresql.org |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose PocketBase if...
- Self-hosting capability
- Authentication system
- Lightweight
Choose PostgreSQL if...
- Reliability
- Performance
- Scalability
With a FactScore™ of 42.3 vs 93.8, PostgreSQL leads in community reception. PocketBase uniquely offers Self-hosting capability and Authentication system, while PostgreSQL stands out for Reliability and Performance.
What Users Say
PocketBase
Pocketbase has been great for getting off the ground with an open-source authentication system and database UI. It is surprisingly efficient, and with liteFS we have been able to continue using it ...
I drew endless inspiration from the PocketBase project: the best documentation, excellent code execution and, of course, the best support in GH discussions.
Super-fast and super-simple infrastructure as a service, for database management, user handlings and small micro-services.
PostgreSQL
Postgres stands out thanks to its rock‑solid reliability and rich feature set—think advanced indexing, robust JSON support, and strong concurrency. It’s open source, highly scalable, and keeps our ...
I prefer PostgreSQL because it's just such an incredibly robust and versatile relational database that I trust. The huge advantage, especially for AI and search stuff lately, is the pgvector extens...
PGVector's native vector operations with PostgreSQL's ACID compliance works perfectly. We're storing millions of embeddings with sub-millisecond similarity search using cosine distance. The async c...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, PocketBase or PostgreSQL?
Based on FactScore™, PostgreSQL leads with a score of 93.8 vs 42.3. PostgreSQL has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of PocketBase compared to PostgreSQL?
PocketBase uniquely offers: Self-hosting capability, Authentication system, Lightweight, Simple setup, Cost-effective.
What are the pros of PostgreSQL compared to PocketBase?
PostgreSQL uniquely offers: Reliability, Performance, Scalability, Advanced features, Advanced indexing.
Is PocketBase better rated than PostgreSQL?
PocketBase is rated 5.0★ from 6 reviews. PostgreSQL is rated 5.0★ from 74 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of PocketBase and PostgreSQL?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. PocketBase scores 42.3 and PostgreSQL scores 93.8.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free