Llama

Meta's open-source family of LLMs

★★★★★ 5.0/5 from 60 reviews

What is Llama?

An openly accessible model that excels at language nuances, contextual understanding, and complex tasks like translation and dialogue generation.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open-source
  • Efficient performance
  • Cost-effective
  • Local inference
  • Content generation
  • Customizable
  • Open for research use
  • Variety of model sizes
  • Versatile
  • Advanced language understanding
  • Detailed and nuanced responses
  • Privacy
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture
  • Multimodal capabilities
  • Translation

Cons

  • Limited consistency
  • Limited specialized knowledge
  • Not fully open-source

Tool Details

Categories LLMs
Website www.llama.com
Became Popular July 19, 2023
Platforms Web
Social

Recent Reviews (8)

A
Alexander Dec 3, 2024
★★★★★

Llama models + fine-tuning = Fast, Performance, Affordable. We use a blend of OpenAI, Anthropic and Llama for our SmythOS product. Usually when we start we use either OAI or Anthropic, and when something is popular/in scale demand, we then train a Llama model to speed things up and reduce costs. Synthetic data is where it's at. To do that, we build classifier agents in SmythOS, and we also build agents to evaluate and compare model providers and identify gaps in our data set.

Cost-effective Efficient performance
A
Ali Dec 29, 2024
★★★★★

We use Llama for a couple of our AI agents due to its open-source flexibility and efficiency. It allows us to customize the model to meet specific requirements while maintaining excellent performance.

Customizable Open-source Efficient performance
F
fmerian Jul 24, 2024
★★★★★

Big thanks to Meta and the Llama 3 team for their contributions to the open-source AI landscape. The availability of powerful, openly accessible models like Llama 3 is driving incredible innovation across the industry. By integrating open-source models into our platform, we can offer unparalleled versatility and empower our users to leverage the best tools available. Together, we're advancing AI in ways that prioritize openness, accessibility, and powerful functionality.

Versatile Open-source
A
Andrei Jan 20, 2025
★★★★☆

Not quite on par with the closed-weights/-source models at the moment. But it's clear that lots of work went into this, and the result is the most capable open-weights model. Please don't call it open-source, because it isn't.

Open for research use Not fully open-source
C
Clem Jul 2, 2024
★★★★★

Fantastic! I use it to create content as part of my job. I improve my prompts as I use them, and I have now reached a point where it saves hours or even days of work for me and my colleagues.

Content generation
以太坊125x Apr 8, 2025
★★★★★

Llama 4’s native multimodal capabilities are seriously impressive. The mixture-of-experts architecture really pushes the boundaries of what’s possible with text and image AI.

Multimodal capabilities Mixture-of-experts architecture
G
Glenn Mar 25, 2025
★★★★☆

If you don't need a big context window, your budget is lean, and privacy is critical, then Llama is a good option to consider.

Cost-effective Privacy
G
Ghulam Jul 23, 2024
★★★★★

Llama-3 405B is impressive. Its performance rivals top models and it's open-source. Highly recommended!

Open-source

Frequently Asked Questions about Llama

When did Llama become popular?

Llama became popular around July 19, 2023.

What are the main advantages of using Llama?

The top advantages of Llama include: open-source, efficient performance, cost-effective, local inference, content generation.

What are the disadvantages of Llama?

Some reported disadvantages of Llama include: limited consistency, limited specialized knowledge, not fully open-source.

What is Llama's overall user rating?

Llama has an overall rating of 5.0/5 based on 60 user reviews.

What type of tool is Llama?

Llama belongs to the following categories: LLMs.

Related LLMs Tools

Compare Llama :

Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos

The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.

Try FactCheckTool Free