Fork
A fast and friendly git client for Mac
GitLab
Complete DevOps platform, delivered as a single application.
Updated February 2026
| Fork | GitLab | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 13 | 10 |
| Pros | 10 | 13 |
| FactScore™ | 53.8 | 52.1 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Fork — Pros
User-friendly interface Complete feature set Efficient workflow Excellent UX Fast performance Developer-friendly features Git integration MacOS optimization Rock-solid stabilityBoth tools — Pros
Free tierOnly in GitLab — Pros
Integrated CI/CD pipelines DevOps platform Self-hosting Version control Automation Collaboration Error and bug tracking Integrations and plugins Kubernetes integration Package and container registries Project management tools Wiki functionOnly in Fork — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in GitLab — Cons
Complex interface for beginnersDetails
| Fork | GitLab | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Git clients | Project management software, Git clients |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | August 30, 2016 | January 31, 2015 |
| Website | git-fork.com | about.gitlab.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Fork if...
- User-friendly interface
- Complete feature set
- Efficient workflow
Choose GitLab if...
- Integrated CI/CD pipelines
- DevOps platform
- Self-hosting
With a FactScore™ of 53.8 vs 52.1, Fork leads in community reception. Fork uniquely offers User-friendly interface and Complete feature set, while GitLab stands out for Integrated CI/CD pipelines and DevOps platform.
What Users Say
Fork
I've found this to be the best Git client available. Its remarkable speed and user-friendly interface make managing my repositories and branches incredibly efficient and effortless.
For clean and visual Git branch management. Perfect for quick commits, merges, and resolving conflicts visually.
Works great, feature set is complete and easy to use.
GitLab
## Overview So, we've been using GitLab for our development projects and it's been pretty awesome so far. We'd definitely recommend it to other teams and organizations who want a reliable and effic...
A sincere thank you to the GitLab team for providing such a comprehensive DevOps platform. GitLab's integrated CI/CD pipelines, version control, and project management tools have streamlined our de...
Our entire dev cycle runs through GitLab — from repos and merge requests to CI/CD. It’s stable, flexible, and keeps our team workflow smooth and centralized.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Fork or GitLab?
Based on FactScore™, Fork leads with a score of 53.8 vs 52.1. Fork has a higher rating of 4.7★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Fork compared to GitLab?
Fork uniquely offers: User-friendly interface, Complete feature set, Efficient workflow, Excellent UX, Fast performance.
What are the pros of GitLab compared to Fork?
GitLab uniquely offers: Integrated CI/CD pipelines, DevOps platform, Self-hosting, Version control, Automation.
Is Fork better rated than GitLab?
Fork is rated 4.7★ from 13 reviews. GitLab is rated 5.0★ from 10 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Fork and GitLab?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Fork scores 53.8 and GitLab scores 52.1.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free