Modern for Wikipedia
A beautiful, clean, modern web UI for Wikipedia
Radix UI
Open-source UI components for building accessible web apps
Updated February 2026
| Modern for Wikipedia | Radix UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 1 | 24 |
| Pros | 0 | 10 |
| FactScore™ | 15.1 | 69.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Modern for Wikipedia — Pros
No unique pros listedBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Radix UI — Pros
Accessible UI components Developer experience Un-styled components React compatibility Community involvement Customizable Excellent documentation Fast performance Headless component library Theme componentOnly in Modern for Wikipedia — Cons
—Both tools — Cons
—Only in Radix UI — Cons
Customizable Limited built-in componentsDetails
| Modern for Wikipedia | Radix UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Chrome Extensions, UI frameworks | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | December 7, 2021 | December 17, 2020 |
| Website | www.modernwiki.app | radix-ui.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Modern for Wikipedia if...
- No unique pros listed
Choose Radix UI if...
- Accessible UI components
- Developer experience
- Un-styled components
With a FactScore™ of 15.1 vs 69.9, Radix UI leads in community reception. Modern for Wikipedia uniquely offers No unique pros listed, while Radix UI stands out for Accessible UI components and Developer experience.
What Users Say
Modern for Wikipedia
Great!
Radix UI
Perfection! It really shows that you have thought about the DX and APIs all the way through, there are so many good and clever features here. I've always been a fan of Radix, but this is one level ...
So many websites have buggy dropdowns and modals. With Radix, these primitives just work, i.e., pressing ESC just closes a modal as you'd expect. No customization needed. Would love for them to exp...
As part of a larger effort to reduce complexity in our own codebase and increase accessibility of Strapi products, we've made the decision to migrate to Radix-UI primitives for many of our components
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Modern for Wikipedia or Radix UI?
Based on FactScore™, Radix UI leads with a score of 69.9 vs 15.1. Radix UI has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Modern for Wikipedia compared to Radix UI?
Modern for Wikipedia uniquely offers: No unique pros listed.
What are the pros of Radix UI compared to Modern for Wikipedia?
Radix UI uniquely offers: Accessible UI components, Developer experience, Un-styled components, React compatibility, Community involvement.
Is Modern for Wikipedia better rated than Radix UI?
Modern for Wikipedia is rated 5.0★ from 1 reviews. Radix UI is rated 5.0★ from 24 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Modern for Wikipedia and Radix UI?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Modern for Wikipedia scores 15.1 and Radix UI scores 69.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free