Pines
A beautiful UI library for Alpine and Tailwind
React
The library for web and native user interfaces
Updated February 2026
| Pines | React | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 8 | 157 |
| Pros | 13 | 16 |
| FactScore™ | 47.7 | 109.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in Pines — Pros
Integrates with Alpine.js Integrates with Tailwind CSS Customizable components Actively maintained Efficient Lightweight Minimalistic design No third-party libraries required Production ready Saves time Seamless integration with Laravel Blade Unique componentsBoth tools — Pros
Excellent documentationOnly in React — Pros
Component-based architecture Dynamic user interfaces Flexibility Fast performance Large ecosystem Scalability Reusable components Strong community support Virtual DOM Easy learning curve Efficient rendering Modular development State management with hooks Developer experience JSXOnly in Pines — Cons
<p>please add skeleton loading animation component.</p> Limited componentsBoth tools — Cons
—Only in React — Cons
Complex setup JSX love/hate relationshipDetails
| Pines | React | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Design resources, UI frameworks | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | June 22, 2023 | January 15, 2023 |
| Website | devdojo.com | react.dev |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose Pines if...
- Integrates with Alpine.js
- Integrates with Tailwind CSS
- Customizable components
Choose React if...
- Component-based architecture
- Dynamic user interfaces
- Flexibility
With a FactScore™ of 47.7 vs 109.9, React leads in community reception. Pines uniquely offers Integrates with Alpine.js and Integrates with Tailwind CSS, while React stands out for Component-based architecture and Dynamic user interfaces.
What Users Say
Pines
Hey Pines team, congrats on the launch! This library seems like a huge timesaver for those of us working with Tailwind and Alpine.js. I love the fact that all the elements are fully customizable an...
My personal favourite UI library, goes really well with the dashboard and landing page
Wow, Pines does look like an amazing UI library for developers! The fact that it integrates seamlessly with Tailwind CSS and Alpine.js would be a real game-changer. The ability to fully customize e...
React
React powers UniDeck’s intuitive interface, enabling a seamless and dynamic user experience for building dashboards without any coding. Its component-based architecture allowed us to rapidly protot...
We have worked on angular extensively in our last startup which was also very good, but for Tablesprint we went for react due to easy learning curve for new team members and for all it's components...
React powers our frontend because it strikes the right balance between flexibility and performance. It let us build a dynamic UI that supports drag-and-drop editing, real-time updates, and seamless...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Pines or React?
Based on FactScore™, React leads with a score of 109.9 vs 47.7. React has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 5.0★.
What are the pros of Pines compared to React?
Pines uniquely offers: Integrates with Alpine.js, Integrates with Tailwind CSS, Customizable components, Actively maintained, Efficient.
What are the pros of React compared to Pines?
React uniquely offers: Component-based architecture, Dynamic user interfaces, Flexibility, Fast performance, Large ecosystem.
Is Pines better rated than React?
Pines is rated 5.0★ from 8 reviews. React is rated 5.0★ from 157 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of Pines and React?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. Pines scores 47.7 and React scores 109.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free