html.to.design
Convert any website into fully editable Figma designs
Radix UI
Open-source UI components for building accessible web apps
Updated February 2026
| html.to.design | Radix UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 16 | 24 |
| Pros | 11 | 10 |
| FactScore™ | 60.7 | 69.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in html.to.design — Pros
Time saving Easy to use Figma integration Private page import Quick iterations UX audits Chrome extension Design system compatibility High accuracy Local styles option One click conversionBoth tools — Pros
—Only in Radix UI — Pros
Accessible UI components Developer experience Un-styled components React compatibility Community involvement Customizable Excellent documentation Fast performance Headless component library Theme componentOnly in html.to.design — Cons
Incomplete imports Complex animation export issues Lack of responsiveness Slow performanceBoth tools — Cons
—Only in Radix UI — Cons
Customizable Limited built-in componentsDetails
| html.to.design | Radix UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Figma Plugins, Design resources | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | October 21, 2022 | December 17, 2020 |
| Website | html.to.design | radix-ui.com |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose html.to.design if...
- Time saving
- Easy to use
- Figma integration
Choose Radix UI if...
- Accessible UI components
- Developer experience
- Un-styled components
With a FactScore™ of 60.7 vs 69.9, Radix UI leads in community reception. html.to.design uniquely offers Time saving and Easy to use, while Radix UI stands out for Accessible UI components and Developer experience.
What Users Say
html.to.design
No reviews yet
Radix UI
Perfection! It really shows that you have thought about the DX and APIs all the way through, there are so many good and clever features here. I've always been a fan of Radix, but this is one level ...
So many websites have buggy dropdowns and modals. With Radix, these primitives just work, i.e., pressing ESC just closes a modal as you'd expect. No customization needed. Would love for them to exp...
As part of a larger effort to reduce complexity in our own codebase and increase accessibility of Strapi products, we've made the decision to migrate to Radix-UI primitives for many of our components
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, html.to.design or Radix UI?
Based on FactScore™, Radix UI leads with a score of 69.9 vs 60.7. Radix UI has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.
What are the pros of html.to.design compared to Radix UI?
html.to.design uniquely offers: Time saving, Easy to use, Figma integration, Private page import, Quick iterations.
What are the pros of Radix UI compared to html.to.design?
Radix UI uniquely offers: Accessible UI components, Developer experience, Un-styled components, React compatibility, Community involvement.
Is html.to.design better rated than Radix UI?
html.to.design is rated 4.9★ from 16 reviews. Radix UI is rated 5.0★ from 24 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of html.to.design and Radix UI?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. html.to.design scores 60.7 and Radix UI scores 69.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free