html.to.design
Convert any website into fully editable Figma designs
React
The library for web and native user interfaces
Updated February 2026
| html.to.design | React | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9★ | 5.0★ |
| Reviews | 16 | 157 |
| Pros | 11 | 16 |
| FactScore™ | 60.7 | 109.9 |
FactScore™ Comparison
FactScore™ weighs both quality (rating) and popularity (reviews) for a fairer ranking than stars alone.
Pros & Cons
Only in html.to.design — Pros
Time saving Easy to use Figma integration Private page import Quick iterations UX audits Chrome extension Design system compatibility High accuracy Local styles option One click conversionBoth tools — Pros
—Only in React — Pros
Component-based architecture Dynamic user interfaces Flexibility Fast performance Large ecosystem Scalability Reusable components Strong community support Virtual DOM Easy learning curve Efficient rendering Excellent documentation Modular development State management with hooks Developer experience JSXOnly in html.to.design — Cons
Incomplete imports Complex animation export issues Lack of responsiveness Slow performanceBoth tools — Cons
—Only in React — Cons
Complex setup JSX love/hate relationshipDetails
| html.to.design | React | |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | Interface design tools, Figma Plugins, Design resources | Interface design tools, Engineering & Development, UI frameworks |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Became Popular | October 21, 2022 | January 15, 2023 |
| Website | html.to.design | react.dev |
Who Should Pick Which?
Choose html.to.design if...
- Time saving
- Easy to use
- Figma integration
Choose React if...
- Component-based architecture
- Dynamic user interfaces
- Flexibility
With a FactScore™ of 60.7 vs 109.9, React leads in community reception. html.to.design uniquely offers Time saving and Easy to use, while React stands out for Component-based architecture and Dynamic user interfaces.
What Users Say
html.to.design
No reviews yet
React
React powers UniDeck’s intuitive interface, enabling a seamless and dynamic user experience for building dashboards without any coding. Its component-based architecture allowed us to rapidly protot...
We have worked on angular extensively in our last startup which was also very good, but for Tablesprint we went for react due to easy learning curve for new team members and for all it's components...
React powers our frontend because it strikes the right balance between flexibility and performance. It let us build a dynamic UI that supports drag-and-drop editing, real-time updates, and seamless...
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, html.to.design or React?
Based on FactScore™, React leads with a score of 109.9 vs 60.7. React has a higher rating of 5.0★ compared to 4.9★.
What are the pros of html.to.design compared to React?
html.to.design uniquely offers: Time saving, Easy to use, Figma integration, Private page import, Quick iterations.
What are the pros of React compared to html.to.design?
React uniquely offers: Component-based architecture, Dynamic user interfaces, Flexibility, Fast performance, Large ecosystem.
Is html.to.design better rated than React?
html.to.design is rated 4.9★ from 16 reviews. React is rated 5.0★ from 157 reviews.
What is the FactScore™ of html.to.design and React?
FactScore™ weighs rating and review volume together. html.to.design scores 60.7 and React scores 109.9.
Don't Get Fooled by Fake Social Media Videos
The world's first fact checker for social media. Paste any link and get an instant credibility score with sources.
Try FactCheckTool Free