◯˚GitStart

We've used Gitstart to augment our developer bandwidth at codewp.ai for a few months (working on platform rebuild / launch). It's a great offering. The founder, Hamza, and our support team are very responsive and attentive. The outputs for our PRs are great quality. I also like the fact that we're helping real world developers level up their skills without the pain of training them ourselves :). We're a bit different than some of the companies mentioned here, very small, agile, and quick moving. Was worried that GitStart wouldn't make sense, but in fact, they allowed us to focus the more complex (and fun) aspects of our platform while getting rid of time draws - a great asset for a small startup. Costs are pretty accurate, communication is good. No complaints at all, they're definitely worth a try.

At Hospitable.com we started using GitStart over the last few months, they worked with us to find a team that supported our tech stack and it's been great so far. The team have been quick to understand the product, and the issues we have asked them to tackle. They have also been open to feedback, and whilst technically our code base isn't always optimised to onboard a team like GitStart they've embraced it and taken care of the assigned tasks with very few issues. The product itself has been great, smooth integration with Linear and GitLab, and everything that happens in the background just seems to work. The experience has only been positive and @ziahamza, @sudocorentin and the rest of the GitStart team and on to something great.

Wow, GitStart sounds like a game-changer for managing pull requests! The idea of assigning tickets and getting back PRs while only paying for the code that gets merged is brilliant. It aligns to optimize the development process and ensure quality code. I'm curious to know more about the process of sending tickets to multiple engineers who review each other's code. How does GitStart ensure that the code review process is efficient and thorough? Are there any specific algorithms or techniques in place to handle this? Also, seeing that GitStart is already being used by Cal.com, Supabase, and SourceGraph is impressive. Did these companies provide feedback on how GitStart has improved their workflow or enhanced their development teams' collaboration? Lastly, as someone who appreciates open-source projects, I would love to hear more about the experiences of individuals or communities using GitStart on public repos. Has it helped them streamline their contribution process and encourage more code reviews? I look forward to hearing more about GitStart and its impact on the development community!